Legal Opinion

Valencia v. Milliken

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1916No. Civ. No. 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, and from an order denying a new trial. F. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

As appears from the complaint, defendant, on or about December 19, 1911, with force and violence, made an indecent assault upon plaintiff, who at the time was a chaste and virtuous single woman over the age of twenty-one years, and then and there, without her consent, debauched and carnally knew her, as a result of which she became pregnant, and on September 17, 3912, gave birth to a child, to her damage in the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars; all of which allegations were by defendant denied.

The case was tried before a jury, which brought in a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. State v. DanforthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glover v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. People v. BattilanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Jaffe v. DeckardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Bishop v. ListonNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Gallina v. AntonelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API