Legal Opinion

Gallina v. Antonelli

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1963No. Civ. 20934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Robert Gallina, a minor, brought this filiation proceeding through his guardian ad litem, Sara Rose Gallina, to have it adjudged that defendant Robert Antonelli was the father of plaintiff and under a duty to support him. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals therefrom., Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the trial court’s finding that respondent was not his father. This argument is without merit. The evidence relative to paternity consisted of the conflicting testimony…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Dastagir v. DastagirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Bixby v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Pyeatte v. PyeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API