Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1905No. 14,277PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Barton district court; Jermain W. Brinckerhoff, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Phillip Miller was convicted of the offense of rape, committed upon Mollie Neidens, a girl under the age of eighteen years. In his appeal he complains that Mollie was permitted to testify as to the birth and parentage of the child, the fruit of the illicit relation. Having testified to the ' intercourse, it was competent for her to state that conception followed, and that the defendant was the father of the child so begotten. (The State v. Walke, 69 Kan. 183, 76 Pac. 408.)

There is complaint that leading questions were allowed in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Young v. . ShulenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. State v. CainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. People v. MayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Central Railroad v. CogginSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. City of Fort Wayne v. ChristieIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Darrigan v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  2. Anderson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. MooreNevada Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Grayson v. DurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API