Legal Opinion

DD & L, INC. v. Burgess

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 9, 1988No. 19028-8-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

Appellant DD&L, Inc. (hereinafter DD&L), challenges the sufficiency of evidence supporting the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law quieting title to a strip of property in John and Mary Burgess (hereinafter Burgess) and Wolfkill Feed and Fertilizer Corporation (hereinafter Wolfkill). 1 Wolfkill cross-appeals and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to two findings of fact.

Facts

On July 31, 1984, DD&L filed suit against Burgess and Wolfkill for trespass. The dispute arose over the location of the northern boundary of an old Chicago, Milwaukee and Puget Sound Railway…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Harbor Air Service, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King County v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Ray v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Ray v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Kesinger v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API