DD & L, INC. v. Burgess
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
Appellant DD&L, Inc. (hereinafter DD&L), challenges the sufficiency of evidence supporting the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law quieting title to a strip of property in John and Mary Burgess (hereinafter Burgess) and Wolfkill Feed and Fertilizer Corporation (hereinafter Wolfkill). 1 Wolfkill cross-appeals and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to two findings of fact.
Facts
On July 31, 1984, DD&L filed suit against Burgess and Wolfkill for trespass. The dispute arose over the location of the northern boundary of an old Chicago, Milwaukee and Puget Sound Railway…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Harbor Air Service, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- King County v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Ray v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Ray v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Kesinger v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.