Legal Opinion

Ray v. King County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 15, 2004No. 50105-4-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

86 P.3d 183 (2004)

Gerald L. RAY and Kathryn B. Ray, husband and wife, Appellants,

v.

KING COUNTY, a political subdivision, Respondent.

No. 50105-4-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 15, 2004.

John Maurice Groen, Groen Stephens & Klinge LLP, Bellevue, WA, for Appellants.

Scott David Johnson, King County Administration Building, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Kristopher Ian Tefft, Olympia, WA, for Amicus Curiae (Building Industry Assn. of Washington).

COX, A.C.J.

This quiet title action presents two questions. First, did an 1887 deed to a railroad convey fee title or an easement? Second,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Urbaitis v. Commonwealth EdisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Veach v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Harris v. Ski Park Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Hornish Trust v. King CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Yakima Interurban Lines Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bryan Kelley And Dorre Don Llc v. Beverly L. TondaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API