Legal Opinion
Young v. John Deere Plow Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 12, 1960No. 38280PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
The plaintiff in error contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the general demurrer and in sustaining the motion to strike his answer. The plaintiff in error further contends that, his answer having been stricken, the court was in error in marking the case in default and, at the next term of court, entering a judgment in favor of the plaintiff because of the default.
The first issue before us is whether the trial court erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the defendants’ answer. The briefs of the two parties consider at great length the. question of whether the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Biggers v. Equitable Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Anderson v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Mock v. KempCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Electro-Kinetics Corp. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Providence Construction Co. v. Bauer.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Newby v. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company v. BibbeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- Glennville Hatchery, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.