Legal Opinion

Hazel v. Tharpe & Brooks, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1981No. 62205, 62206PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

The defendants appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff in a suit to enforce their obligation as sureties on a promissory note. Held:

1. The trial court did not err in concluding that the plaintiff had standing to bring the suit, although the note was made payable to a corporation other than the plaintiff and the defendants allege that it was not properly endorsed by that corporation upon its transfer to the plaintiff. The plaintiff established without dispute that it had obtained possession of the note by purchasing it for value from the named payee. Because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Broun v. Bank of EarlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. First National Bank v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Hurst v. Stith Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Blanton v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ashcraft v. Lookadoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  2. Schroeder v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Kensington Partners, LLC v. Beal Bank NevadaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. National City Bank v. BusbinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co. v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API