Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Toler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1933No. 4-3267PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The writ of prohibition is the appropriate remedy where the inferior court has no jurisdiction over the person of the petitioner and can acquire none. Caldwell v. Dodge, 179 Ark. 235, 15 S. W. (2d) 391. It is a discretionary writ. Merchants’ & Planters’ Bank v. Hammock, 178 Ark. 746, 12 S. W. (2d) 421; Galloway v. LeCroy, 169 Ark. 838, 277 S. W. 35. It is never granted unless the inferior tribunal has clearly exceeded its authority, and the party applying for it has no other protection against the wrong that will be done by such usurpation. Macon v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Monette Road Improvement District v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Berry v. SaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Merchants' & Planters' Bank v. HammockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Order of Railway Conductors of America v. BandySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. District No. 21 United Mine Workers of America v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lafargue v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Webb v. Honorable Todd HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Taylor v. GirardIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Campbell v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Breshears v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API