Merchants' & Planters' Bank v. Hammock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.
(after stating the facts). The office of the writ of prohibition is to restrain an inferior tribunal from proceeding in a matter not within its jurisdiction; but it is never granted unless the inferior tribunal has clearly exceeded its authority and the party applying for it has no other protection against the wrong that shall be done by such usurpation. Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Bandy, Judge, 177 Ark. 694, 8 S. W. (2d) 448, and cases cited. It is well settled that, where the jurisdiction is disputable, the granting or refusal of the writ is discretionary. American Casualty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rush v. DenhardtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. BandySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Finley v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Weaver v. LeathermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- American Casualty Co. v. LeaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lafargue v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Twin City Lines, Inc. v. Cummings, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Crowe v. FutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Roach v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.