Legal Opinion

Silvers v. Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2010No. B221229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KUMAR, J. *

I. INTRODUCTION

Two categories of insurance carriers provide property and casualty insurance in California: insurers licensed by the Department of Insurance (DOI) and “surplus line insurers.” Licensed insurers, also known as “admitted insurers,” have a presence in California, have full access to the insurance market, and are statutorily “entitled to transact insurance business” in California (Ins. Code, § 24). On the other hand, surplus line insurers, a subset of the “nonadmitted” insurance market, are not licensed by California and have no presence in California. Although a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Coshow v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Diamond Benefits Life Ins. Co. v. TrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'n v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Chen v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hsu v. Axis Specialty Europe SEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  2. Lynch v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Santos v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Top Line Apparel v. Ategrity Specialty Insurance Company et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
  5. US HF Cellular Commc'ns v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API