Legal Opinion

Hsu v. Axis Specialty Europe SE

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 11, 2025No. 3:25-cv-04826Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRED HSU, Case No. 25-cv-04826-SK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 AXIS SPECIALTY EUROPE SE, Regarding Docket No. 8 11 Defendant. 12 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by 13 Axis Specialty Europe SE (“Defendant”) for lack of personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, 14 forum non conveniens. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and all parties 15 have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, (Dkt. Nos. 10, 11).…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API