Hazlehurst v. Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
Petitioners, Rolf and Angela Hazlehurst, seek review of a decision entered by the special master on February 12, 2009, denying their son, William Yates Hazlehurst, compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (“the Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to -34 (2006), for a neurological injury, identified as regressive autism, allegedly caused by the administration of the measles, mumps, and rubella (“MMR”) vaccine. Petitioners contend that the special master improperly based her decision on evidence that should have been excluded, disregarded other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Debra Ann Knudsen, by Her Parents and Legal Guardians, Doris P. Knudsen and Dale Knudsen v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Hazlehurst v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Cedillo ex rel. Cedillo v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Paluck ex rel. Paluck v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Copenhaver ex rel. Copenhaver v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Fesanco v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.