Legal Opinion
Paluck ex rel. Paluck v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 18, 2012No. 07-889VPublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
LETTOW, Judge.
Petitioners Doug and Rhonda Paluck, on behalf of their son, Karl Paluck, seek review of a decision by a special master issued December 14, 2011, which denied them compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub.L. No. 99-660, § 311, 100 Stat. 3743, 3765-84 (1986) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34) (“Vaccine Act”). The Palucks allege that Karl’s receipt of the mumps-measles-rubella (“MMR”), varicella, and Prevnar vaccines on January 19, 2005 caused him to develop, or exacerbated a preexisting condition resulting in,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Paluck v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Simanski ex rel. O.A.S. v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- R.V. v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Contreras v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- M.S.B. Ex Rel. Bast v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.