Legal Opinion

Parmelee, Miller, Welsh & Kratz, P.C. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1979No. Appeal, No. 2091 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Claimant is an attorney-at-law, admitted to the Pennsylvania bar. The question raised on this appeal by his former employer is whether he became self-employed for unemployment compensation purposes and therefore ineligible for benefits under Section 402(h) of The Unemployment Compensation Law.1

The findings of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) are succinct and supported by substantial evidence:

2. Claimant was advised by the employer early in August that his last day of work for the employer would be August 31,1977.

*5723. During the month of August claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edelman v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. of REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. FinnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Rodites v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Clark v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Centorame v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Logut v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. In Re Saint Joseph's HospitalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API