Legal Opinion

Centorame v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1984No. Appeal, No. 567 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

In this appeal by Gruido Centorame from a denial of unemployment compensation benefits by a referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of ‘Review, the sole question is whether he was ineligible because “engaged in self-employment,”1 in that, after separation from his previous employer, all that he did was that he “had business cards made and placed an advertisement in a newspaper ... holding himself out for home improvement work,” according to the referee’s unoontested finding.

Noting that a conclusion as to self-employment presents a question of law subject to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parmelee, Miller, Welsh & Kratz, P.C. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. MinierCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Logut v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Key v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. McConnell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Roche v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Kelly v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. K.L. Cristea v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API