Legal Opinion

Disch v. Closset

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

Exceptions I and II are based on the admission, over the objection of defendant, of testimony of a witness to tbe effect that plaintiff’s wife in May, 1922, stated that she was the wife of the defendant. It was admitted by the court as evidence of the attitude of plaintiff’s wife, and was limited to that purpose by the court. A letter written by plaintiff’s wife to him in December, 1921, was admitted over objection for the same purpose. At the time the testimony was received the judge explained to the jury that it must not be considered as evidence tending to prove the defendant guilty, but…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Valentine v. PollakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Hamilton v. McNeillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maggay v. NikitkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Patterson v. SkoglundOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Lang v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Myers v. BrickwedelOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. McKinnon v. ChenowethOregon Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API