Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Skoglund

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1947PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

Mrs. Dollie G-. Patterson brought this action against Mrs. Doretta Pearl Skoglund, seeking damages for alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s husband.

The complaint recites that, beginning on or about November 15, 1943, while the Pattersons were living together happily as man and wife, the defendant, with knowledge of such marital relationship, by a calculated and malicious course of conduct alienated from plaintiff the affections of her husband, and caused him to desert and abandon her, whereby she was deprived of his conjugal affection, society and aid. Specific means are alleged to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Fuller v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. Schneider v. TapferOregon Supreme Court · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bliss v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chaffin v. ChaffinOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Draper v. MULLENNEXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Linkhart v. SavelyOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Chamberlain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API