Legal Opinion

United States v. Dean Nelson Burns

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1971No. 71-1641_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Burns was convicted for wilfully failing to register under the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 U.S.C.App. § 462. He contends on appeal that admission of his oral statement to a government agent was improper under the Miranda guidelines, that the statute under which he has been prosecuted is unconstitutional, and that his three-year sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

The record amply supports the district’s court’s finding that appellant received the Miranda warnings and waived his rights before making his statement.

Appellant’s constitutional challenge to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Herbert A. EllenbogenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Cecil Ray Little v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Michael Porter LeavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. David John GidmarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Quema HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Louis Distasio, Sr., United States of America v. Jerry J. DistasioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. LayneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. United States v. Guy Robin EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Fredrick G. Doyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API