Legal Opinion

Cecil Ray Little v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1969No. 153-68_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, District Judge.

The appellant Cecil Ray Little was indicted for willfully and knowingly fail ing to report for and submit to induction into the armed forces of the United States, in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. He was tried to a jury, found guilty, and sentenced by the court to a five year prison term, the maximum penalty provided by law for violation of the statute under which he was charged and convicted.

On appeal, Little asserts that the Government’s failure to prove the essential elements of the crime with which he was charged requires reversal of his conviction.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richard Glenn Keene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. Arnold G. SandbankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Willie L. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. LybrandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  5. William Edward Franks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. LeichtfussDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  2. United States v. Charles Douglas ChaudronCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Tommy Don Haskins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Gregg Steven StrayhornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. John Frederick WeersingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API