Legal Opinion

Fredrick G. Doyle v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1983No. 83-3578PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

This appeal from the denial of a § 2255 motion presents three issues: (1) Did the trial court have jurisdiction to correct an illegal sentence while appeal was pending? (2) Was defendant denied his right to appeal when the appeal was dismissed for counsel’s failure to prosecute? (3) Was defendant denied effective assistance of counsel independent of any denial of right to appeal?

We hold that the trial court did have jurisdiction to correct the sentence, and that counsel’s ineffectiveness denied Doyle his right to appeal but did not otherwise impair his defense.

FACTS

Doyle…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Richard E. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. William Morris Jeanne Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Randal LongfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Alberto De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Claude S. BirtleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Walter F. Kusay, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API