Legal Opinion
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Katzenbach
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 19, 1990No. 85-14924 CA A62304 (Control), CA A62560PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*734RIGGS, J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on remand from the Supreme Court. Boise Cascade Corp. v. Katzenbach, 307 Or 391, 768 P2d 395 (1989). We review for substantial evidence and errors of law and affirm. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill, 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988).
Claimant was working on a green chain in June, 1985, when he suffered a nondisabling injury that was diagnosed as right wrist tendonitis. Employer accepted the claim, described on the notice of injury form as “right wrist strain.” Claimant continued to have pain in his right wrist. Four months…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HiattOregon Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tattoo v. Barrett Business ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Hill v. QwestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Daquilante-Richards v. CIGNA Ins. Cos.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. KatzenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Cloud v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.