Legal Opinion
State v. Hiatt
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1987No. CC CF 85-195; CA A37976; SC S33110PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*62JONES, J.
Defendant petitions this court to reverse his convictions for Rape in the First Degree and Sodomy in the First Degree. He alleges that the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s denial of both his motion for a psychological examination of the victim and his motion for a continuance to subpoena a psychotherapist who previously examined the victim. We affirm.
The charges arose from defendant’s relationship with the daughter of his former wife. Defendant married the child’s mother in 1976. They separated in August of 1982. In November 1982, the two children (the victim and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- State v. WalgraeveOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- McMillan v. United Mortgage Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Sanchez-CruzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Upham v. BonebrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. KatzenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.