Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Paynter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 1, 2006No. 03CV0551; A125029Published

1Opinion of the Court

129 P.3d 203 (2006)

204 Or. App. 119

Brenda HAMILTON, Appellant,

v.

George PAYNTER, dba Seahawk Seafood; Carvalho Fisheries, Inc.; and William Carvalho, Respondents.

03CV0551; A125029.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 7, 2005.

Decided February 1, 2006.

Manuel C. Hernandez, Bandon, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the opening brief was Hernandez & Associates, LLC. On the reply brief was David M. Hernandez.

Camille Tourje argued the cause for respondent George Paynter, dba Seahawk Seafood. On the brief was Kent W. Day.

Robert A. Ford, Eugene, argued the cause for…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Deluxe Cabinet Works v. MessmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Duncan v. DubinOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ben Rybke Co. v. Royal Globe InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API