Legal Opinion

Saad v. Rodriguez

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1986No. 50471PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.

This appeal involves the single issue of whether the one-year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.11 applies to escrow work performed by an attorney. The trial court answered this question in the affirmative and granted summary judgment to appellees Weinberger and the law firm of Tricarichi, Carnes, Kube & Weinberger. Upon review of the factual setting of the case, the relevant documents and applicable law, the decision of the trial court is affirmed as modified and reversed and remanded in part for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

On March 23, 1981,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skidmore & Hall v. RottmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Squire v. BrancifortiOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Pippin v. Kern-Ward Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crosby v. BeamOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Union Savings Bank v. Lawyers Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Andrews v. CarmodyOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Johnson v. U.S. Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Gomez v. Huntington Trust Co., NADistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API