Legal Opinion

Hadassah v. Schwartz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 2011No. c-110046PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fischer, Judge.

{¶ 1} Judgment debtor-appellant Robert L. Schwartz appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to quash and overruling his objections to a garnishment order, which permitted garnishment of Schwartz’s property held in a law firm’s IOLTA account to help satisfy a $2,292,469 judgment owed by Schwartz to judgment creditor-appellee Hadassah, The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc. (“Hadassah”). For the reasons stated below, we determine that Schwartz’s appeal is without merit, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

{¶ 2} Hadassah initiated this garnishment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Union Properties, Inc. v. PattersonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Silver Creek Supply v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. In re Estate of MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. AntonelliOhio Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prokos v. HinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API