Legal Opinion

Hardy v. San Fernando Valley Chamber of Commerce

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1950No. Civ. 17569PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action against defendants to recover attorney’s fees. He recorded a lis pendens. His fourth amended complaint contained two counts. Defendants’ demurrer to the first count was sustained without leave to amend. Their demurrer to the second count was sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiff declined to amend. He appeals from an order expunging the lis pendens from the record, from the minute orders sustaining the demurrer to each count, and from the judgment which followed.

We briefly summarize the allegations of the complaint.

First Count

Plaintiff at all times…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gerritt v. Fullerton Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Cookson v. FitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API