Legal Opinion

Flowmaster, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1993No. A060508PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

Petitioner Flowmaster, Inc. (Flowmaster), is the defendant in plaintiff Donald Von Dohlen’s (hereafter plaintiff) civil action for personal injuries incurred by him while operating a hydraulic power press manufactured by Flowmaster. Plaintiff is Flowmaster’s employee and was injured while performing his duties as a “parts maker.” Flowmaster moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s suit is barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the worker’s compensation law. (Lab. Code, *1024§ 3600.)1 The trial court denied the motion, and Flowmaster seeks review by this…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Miller v. Bechtel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dep't of Indus. Relations v. UI Video Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Resure, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. 1231 Euclid Homeowners Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Singh v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Good v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API