Horn v. Protective Life Insurance Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
143 S.E.2d 70 (1965)
264 N.C. 157
George R. HORN
v.
PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
No. 33.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
July 23, 1965.
Van Winkle, Walton, Buck & Wall, Herbert L. Hyde, Asheville, for defendant appellant.
Hamrick & Jones, Rutherfordton, for plaintiff appellee.
RODMAN, Justice.
The first and principal question debated in the briefs and on oral argument is directed to the motion to nonsuit. Defendant asserts the court's ruling was erroneous for two reasons:
First, plaintiff alleged, and defendant denied, that proof of loss required by the policy had been given. Plaintiff must…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Penn v. Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Penn v. Standard Life & Accidental InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Lucas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Arthurs v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Rice v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Barnes v. Home Beneficial Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Wooten v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.