Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1958PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

These two cases were tried together. In each case, the defendant filed a motion for a directed verdict which was denied. There were verdicts for the plaintiff. The trial judge, under leave reserved, entered a verdict for each defendant.

The action against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereinafter called Metropolitan) was to recover under the double indemnity feature of a fife insurance policy covering the life of the plaintiff’s husband (hereinafter called the insured). The action against United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (hereinafter called Fidelity) was brought to recover…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Brownhill v. KivlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Taylor v. CreeleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Nass v. Town of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Commonwealth v. RembiszewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Sevigny's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Commonwealth v. WalterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API