Legal Opinion

Wilson v. National Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1928No. 28,087PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action by the lessor against the lessee to recover damages for the abandonment- of the leased premises and refusal to pay the rent for the last two years and more .of a five-year period covered by the lease. The defendant answered, admitting the execution of the lease and the occupancy of the premises thereunder for nearly three years, but alleging that the lease was surrendered by defendant and accepted by plaintiff; that the lease was for a specific purpose prevented by law; that the action was prematurely brought; and that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Sherman Center Town Co. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Brown v. CairnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Drake v. First National Bank of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Holly v. City of NeodeshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hawkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Cornett v. RothSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Freeto v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Mabery v. Western Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API