Legal Opinion

Cornett v. Roth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1983No. 55,137PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

Charles E. Cornett and Virginia B. Cornett, husband and wife, the plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal from various judgments and orders entered in favor of the defendants, Clifford R. Roth and Mid-Continent Research, Inc. The defendant Mid-Continent Research, Inc., was formerly known as Mid-Continent Research Animals, Inc., and will be referred to herein as MCRA. The Cornetts also appeal from the assessment of an attorney fee for allegedly filing a frivolous motion and from a judgment in favor of Roth in a different case which was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Denison State Bank v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Wilson v. National Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Mabery v. Western Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. George E. Failing Co. v. Cardwell Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Equity Investors, Inc. v. Ammest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Eric C. Rajala, Trustee in Bankruptcy for General Poly Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Allied Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. Mynatt v. CollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Wood v. GrohSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API