Legal Opinion
Richards v. Reiter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 4, 2011No. A10-1098PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
The petitioner below, Michael Richards, brought a petition seeking joint legal custody of and parenting time with D.T.R., and named the mother, appellant Lynette Marthe and her then-husband, respondent Derek Reiter, as parties to the proceeding. The district court adjudicated Reiter as the legal father of D.T.R. and dismissed Richards’ petition. Marthe appealed, but Richards did not. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal on the ground that *511Marthe lacks standing to appeal. Because we conclude that Marthe is an aggrieved party and has standing to appeal a paternity…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Soohoo v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Annandale Advocate v. City of AnnandaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McCaughtry v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Daniel Garcia-Mendoza v. 2003 Chevy Tahoe, Vin 1GNEC13V23R143453, Plate 235JBMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In Re Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of GILLETTE CHILDREN’S SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE, St. Luke’s Hospital, North Memorial Health Care, HealthEast Care System, Park Nicollet Health Services, Fairview Health Services, and Children’s Hospitals and Clinics of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.