Wit Associates, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This post-award bid protest case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS defendant’s cross-motion and DENIES plaintiff’s motion, thereby concluding that no relief is appropriate herein.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2
On August 13, 2003, the Army and the Military Traffic Management Command of the Department of Defense issued Solicitation No. DAMT01-03-R-0025 (the “Solicitation”) for storage and traffic management of household goods and unaccompanied baggage belonging to service…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Savantage Financial Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Argencord Mach. & Equip., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- NEQ, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.