Legal Opinion

Wit Associates, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 17, 2004No. 04-167CPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

This post-award bid protest case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS defendant’s cross-motion and DENIES plaintiff’s motion, thereby concluding that no relief is appropriate herein.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2

On August 13, 2003, the Army and the Military Traffic Management Command of the Department of Defense issued Solicitation No. DAMT01-03-R-0025 (the “Solicitation”) for storage and traffic management of household goods and unaccompanied baggage belonging to service…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Savantage Financial Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Argencord Mach. & Equip., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. NEQ, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API