Legal Opinion

Redmond v. Royal Ford, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1979No. 35365PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal contests the validity of a covenant not to *712compete.

Appellant was employed in July, 1974, by oral agreement as a salesman for Royal Ford, Inc., a Ford automobile dealership. Royal Ford, Inc., acted through Richard Royal, its President and sole stockholder. Royal agreed he would at a future time sell appellant some stock in the company if his work was satisfactory. In April, 1975, a written contract was entered into whereby appellant was hired in an executive capacity and sold a 10% stock interest in Royal on deferred payments. It provided that in the event the employment was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Hood v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Jenkins v. Jenkins Irrigation, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. Insurance Center, Inc. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Palmer & Cay, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Horne v. DrachmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Southeast Consultants, Inc. v. McCrary Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. White v. Fletcher/Mayo/Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Dunaway v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API