Hood v. Legg
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The issue as to whether the covenant is reasonable was properly considered by the auditor as a question of law, and he properly made a finding of law on that question. It was error for the court to rerefer that issue to the auditor with the direction to make a finding of fact; and the court also erred, after the auditor had filed his finding of fact on that question, in submitting such finding to the jury for determination. From the earliest times in England down to the present time in this country, courts have uniformly ruled that the reasonableness of such a covenant 'is a question for the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Linn v. SigsbeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Knight & Jillson Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Shirk v. Loftis Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Anchor Electric Co. v. HawkesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Marsh USA Inc. v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Palmer v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Richard P. Rita Personnel Services International, Inc. v. KotSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.