Legal Opinion
Palmer & Cay, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 1, 2005No. 03-16248PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from two employee and client non-solicitation agreements entered into between James B. Meathe, an insurance executive, and Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc. (“MMC”), his former employer. The district court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of Meathe and his current employer, Palmer & Cay, Inc. (“P&C”), and held that the agreements were unenforceable “within the state of Georgia” under Georgia public policy. The district court enjoined MMC from attempting to enforce the agreements within the state. We must determine whether the district court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Neal Horsley v. Gloria FeldtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- William S. Manuel v. Convergys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. George Lobrano, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Ajaka v. BrooksAmerica Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Eisenberg v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.