State v. Geeslin
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 In this case, the court of appeals declined to consider whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on a necessarily included offense. We conclude that the court of appeals should have addressed the issue.
I
¶ 2 Tracie Geeslin was arrested after placing shoplifted items into a stolen car. She was charged with several crimes, including theft of a means of transportation in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1814(A)(5) (2001). At trial, Geeslin requested that the jury also be instructed on unlawful use of a means of transportation. See AR.S. §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CelayaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WallArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LujanArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. DuganArizona Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Christepher E. LuaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. George Anthony Dominguez Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State of Arizona v. Bayron Perez AguedaArizona Supreme Court · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.