Legal Opinion

State v. Geeslin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2010No. CR-09-0205-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 In this case, the court of appeals declined to consider whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on a necessarily included offense. We conclude that the court of appeals should have addressed the issue.

I

¶ 2 Tracie Geeslin was arrested after placing shoplifted items into a stolen car. She was charged with several crimes, including theft of a means of transportation in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1814(A)(5) (2001). At trial, Geeslin requested that the jury also be instructed on unlawful use of a means of transportation. See AR.S. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CelayaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. WallArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. LujanArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. DuganArizona Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Christepher E. LuaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. State of Arizona v. George Anthony Dominguez Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. State of Arizona v. Bayron Perez AguedaArizona Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API