Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 19, 2013No. 1 CA-CR 12-0691PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KESSLER, Judge.

¶ 1 Dina Marie Gonzales appeals from the sentence imposed after she was convicted of shoplifting. Gonzales argues that the trial court erred by accepting her counsel’s stipulation to two prior felony convictions without complying with the requirements of Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure (“Rule”) 17.6. Applying the principles of State v. Morales, 215 Ariz. 59, 157 P.3d 479 (2007), we hold that the trial court’s failure to conduct a Rule 17.6 colloquy, although fundamental error, did not result in prejudice and, therefore, does not require a remand. The stipulation, combined…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. MoralesArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AlcantarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. State v. BracyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. State v. FouchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. State v. RoeschenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API