Legal Opinion
Porter v. Lux
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 11, 1946No. 11324PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
The District Court, in granting an application of the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, to whom we shall refer as the Administrator, to restrain appellees from violating the Emergency Price Control Act1 limited the duration *757of the injunction to June 30, 1946. The Administrator complains that such limitation in time is not warranted under the facts of this case.
In the action for injunction initiated by the Administrator treble damages were asked for an alleged violation of the Price Control Act by appellees, such violations consisting of (1) sales of meat…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Delno v. Market St. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Bowles v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. QuonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin Jimenez v. Bruce Barber, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for the Thirteenth Immigration DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Woods v. MertesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,212 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Blazon Corporation Arthur E. Lloyd Gary B. Larson Utah Capital Corporation Glenn W. McMurray Securities and Exchange Commission v. Blazon Corporation, Utah Capital Corporation and Glenn W. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Blazon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979