Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Quon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1946No. 11105PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
An appeal as this one from a judgment denying an injunction ordinarily brings up nothing for review but the question of whether the trial court’s discretion was plainly abused.
The lower court found that between July 3, 1944, and July 28, 1944, in violation of Section 2.8 of General Ration Order No. 8, of paragraphs (a) and (d) (1) and (3) of Section 10.5 of Ration Order No. 16 and paragraphs (a) and (c) (1) and (3) of *73Section 9.5 of Ration Order No. 13,1 appellees sold to R. D. Sikes, operator of the Nanking Cafe at El Centro, California, various rationed meats without…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sunbeam Gold Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Williams Iron Works Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Murray Hill Restaurant, Inc. v. Thirteen Twenty One Locust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Gypsum Antitrust Cases. Advance Drywall Co. v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Maria Mendoza, Individually and on Behalf of Stephen Mendoza, a Minor Theresa Trujillo, Individually and on Behalf of Albert Trujillo, Joe Trujillo, and David Trujillo, Minors Alberto Sanchez, Individually and on Behalf of Jaime Sanchez, Ana Celis Sanchez, John Sanchez, Ernest Sanchez, George Sanchez, and Betty Sanchez, Minors and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, and Julia O. Flores, Billie Gutierrez, Theresa Medina, Betty M. Granillo, Carol Cruz-Popkin, Barney Paul Popkin, Carmen P. Urrutia, Manuel Alvarado, Carolyn Hackworth, Gloria Hagler, Johnny Randolph-Kelly, Thelma B. Manriquez, Aldolfo A. Suarez, Nat Washington Ii, Ralph O. Gomez, Juan Brito, Marcia Almeda, Emilia Talamantez, Ellen Lee Esperanza Silva, Antonette Romo, Ronald Q. Huerta, and Lupe Montano, Plaintiffs-Objectors-Appellants v. United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Tucson School District Number 1 the Board of Education, Tucson School District Number 1 Leba Wine, Soleng Tom, Mitchell Vavich, Helen Haffley, and Katie Dusenberry, Individually and as Members, Board of Education, Tucson School District Number 1 Thomas Lee, Individually and as Superintendent of Tucson School District Number 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Mendoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Washington Capitols Basketball Club, Inc. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,747 Securities and Exchange Commission v. United Financial Group, Inc., Formerly Known as Usi Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.