Barker v. Sartori
Washington Supreme Court
■Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered May 29, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in a proceeding to determine the application of condemnation awards, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
In the year 1910, the city of Seattle began proceedings to condemn certain lots for park purposes. Among these were lots 6 and 7, block 1, Columbia Terrace addition, and lots 7, block 24, of Squire’s Lakeside addition. These lots were owned by Patrick Barker, who was made a party to the condemnation proceeding. Upon a trial of the condemnation case, Mr. Barker was awarded $2,200 for the lots in Columbia Terrace addition, and $1,013 for the lots in Squire’s Lakeside: addition.
After these awards were made and the money paid into court, R. Sartori, who claimed to hold a mortgage lien on lot 7,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vallett v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Cornish v. WoolvertonMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Gray v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burns Mortgage Co. v. FriedSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Des Moines Savings Bank v. ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Bank of California v. National City Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
- Huyler's v. Ritz-Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co. of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1924
- Sterling Colorado Agency, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. Sterling Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, Sterling Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Sterling Colorado Agency, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.