Legal Opinion
Hanson v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 14, 1936No. 7 Div. 382PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
It is urged that the Court of Appeals did not give effect to their opinion in the case of Hurst v. State, 24 Ala.App. 47, 129 So. 714, in holding that the plea of former jeopardy was subject to demurrer.
The pleas in the two cases are practically the same, except as disclosed by the indictment made an exhibit in each case. In the Hurst Case, supra, defendant was on trial for killing one Farmer, and the indictment copied in the plea showed that the former trial was on an indictment for killing one Dewy. The plea alleged that they both were based on the same matter and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Hurst v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- Day v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Dudley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leverett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Deutcsh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Connelly v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.