Legal Opinion

Connelly v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1941No. 1 Div. 361PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

The defendant appeals from a conviction of conspiracy to violate Section 4279 of the Code, 1923, which denounces as a crime the carrying on of the business of bookmaking or pool selling.

The defendant first sought discharge at the trial by interposing a plea of’ former acquittal, which plea alleged a previous trial and acquittal in the same court tmder a charge of the actual violation of said Section 4279. Demurrers were properly sustained thereto, it appearing from-the face of said plea that the two offenses, are not the same, nor would the facts necessary to convict on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Lancaster v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Everage v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Douglas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. Weekley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API