Legal Opinion

Dudley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1923No. 5 Div. 485PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER,' J.

The indictment contained three counts: The first charging burglary; the second, grand larceny; the third, buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, knowing that it .had been stolen, and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. The defendant was convicted under the third count.

The property alleged to have been stolen was a copper worm, a component part of a still, which had been captured by one Rag-land, the then sheriff of Russell county, and . which copper worm was taken by the sheriff to Jhis office in the courthouse, from which place it was stolen in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  3. Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eddy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Hanson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Cowart v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API