Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1951No. 5 Div. 340PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

This appellant has been found guilty of assault with intent to rape.

In a former proceeding he had been indicted for carnal knowledge of a girl under twelve years of age. That indictment arose out of the same facts and on the same occurrence as the present charge. The judgment in this former case was reversed by us for two reasons: First, that the indictment was void ifor the reason that it was returned by a grand jury without legal warrant in that the grand jury had not been properly drawn, and second, that the jury’s verdict finding the appellant guilty of assault with intent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  2. Welch v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Kilgore v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Curry v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Hogue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Ex Parte WillifordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Brummitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Stillwell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API