Legal Opinion

State v. Oien

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2006No. 20050451PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Jason Oien appealed his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia, entered upon a conditional plea of guilty after the district court denied his motion to suppress. We affirm, concluding Oien did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises searched, and therefore may not challenge the search that led to his arrest.

I

[¶ 2] Sarah Jones, Oien’s girlfriend, was renting an apartment from the Housing Authority of Cass County. In March 2005, police were called to Jones’ apartment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. Douglas Edward RamboCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. State v. KitchenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. WardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. AlbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. JacobsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API