Legal Opinion

State v. Woinarowicz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2006No. 20060032PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jami Woinarowicz appeals from her conviction entered upon a conditional plea of guilty to charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. Woinarowicz claims evidence discovered during a search of the hotel room should have been suppressed, and the district court erred in allowing hearsay testimony at the suppression hearing. We affirm Woinarowicz’s conviction.

I

[IT 2] On April 25, 2005, Fargo Police Officer Robert Stanger and two other officers were dispatched to the Holiday Inn after employees reported…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. State v. DalyNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. TimmermanUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API