State v. Woinarowicz
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jami Woinarowicz appeals from her conviction entered upon a conditional plea of guilty to charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. Woinarowicz claims evidence discovered during a search of the hotel room should have been suppressed, and the district court erred in allowing hearsay testimony at the suppression hearing. We affirm Woinarowicz’s conviction.
I
[IT 2] On April 25, 2005, Fargo Police Officer Robert Stanger and two other officers were dispatched to the Holiday Inn after employees reported…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. DalyNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. TimmermanUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.