McKee v. De Graffenreid
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original ■ action in mandamus by C. F. McKee and others-against R. P. De Graffenreid and others.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The plaintiffs, C. F. McKee, S. McKee, and F. McKee, were duly charged with violating or disobeying, when not in the presence or hearing of the court or judge, an order of injunction or restraint made or rendered by the court or the judge of the said court. Said plaintiffs in due time demanded a trial by jury as to their guilt or innocence of the charge, which was denied. This proceeding in error is brought that the judge of said court may be required to grant said plaintiffs a trial by jury, as provided by section 25, art. 2 (Bill of Rights), of the Constitution of this state. It is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Evans v. Willis, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- In Re Merchants'stock and Grain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Farmer v. LoofbourrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Estey v. HoldrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Best v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Seay v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.