Legal Opinion

Seay v. Howell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1957No. 37111PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in this court by petitioner, Frank Seay, under Art. VII, § 2, Oklahoma Constitution, to prohibit respondent, District Court in Semi nole County, Oklahoma, and the Hon. Bob Howell as Judge of said Court, from proceeding further in an indirect contempt action in Case No. 6681 in that court.

The information and affidavit for indirect criminal contempt in that court charges in substance that Frank Seay, an attorney, employed one R. A. Westbrook to attempt to influence the verdict of six prospective jurors who had been summoned to appear as jurors in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SpeedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  2. McKee v. De GraffenreidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Best v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Ex Parte BallewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Heard v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Sommer v. SommerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. CryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. In Re the Habeas Corpus of YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. LAY v. ELLISSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API