Astra Trading Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rici-iaRdsoN, Judge:
Tbe instant protests against tbe legality of tbe collector’s liquidations have been consolidated for trial. Tbe sole question involved is whether notices of appraisement were given, as required by 19 U.S.C.A., § 15011 (section 501, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended), on entries of binoculars and leather cases, imported at New York from Japan and advanced in value on appraisement. It is claimed in the protests that notices of appraisement were not given. The Government contends that such notices were given.
In support of its protest claim, plaintiff offered the testimony of its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orlex Dyes & Chemicals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Compass Instrument & Optical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Nippon Dry Goods Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- United States v. Nippon Dry Goods Co.United States Customs Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schayer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Plywood & Door Southern Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. International Importers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Getz Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.